The debtor holds a professional liability policy which also covers non-debtor parties. The court granted stay relief to the insurer to permit it to pay defense costs for the non-debtors out of proceeds that are not property of the bankruptcy estate.

The court clarified prior orders in this matter and ruled that a refinanced but not reaffirmed obligation was unenforceable against debtor. Whether the discharge can be used as an affirmative defense to a collection action was up to the state court.

Creditor with security interest in debtors' vehicle sold the vehicle in a commercially reasonable manner, for less than amount owed. The deficiency is an unsecured claim, and may include attorneys' fees & costs if underlying security documents so provide

Corporate stock not listed in debtor's schedules was not administered or abandoned. The trustee may reopen the case to sell the stock, but should investigate its value and advertise the sale to comply with the best-interests-of creditors requirement

Dismissal of this Chapter 11 case, rather than conversion, was in the best interest of creditors. Rehabilitation was not reasonably likely, given the debtors' continued delays in providing financial data to creditors and formulating a plan.

After trial on the bank's § 523(a)(2)(B) complaint, the court entered a money judgment in the bank's favor for the deficiency balance due after the sale of collateral. The court found that the debtor had significantly overstated the collateral's value.

Secured party's UCC continuation statement, even though partially incomplete, was sufficient to provide notice of the claimed security interest. Because it substantially complied with Neb. UCC 9-402, it "re-perfected" creditor's lapsed financing statement

In a fee discussion with the attorney who represented her pre-petition, the debtor did not make a false representation as to her ability to pay or the source of funds for the retainer, so the debt was not excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(2)(A).

The court denied the trustee's motion for summary judgment on claims concerning preferential transfers. There was a question as to the insider status of one of the defendant transferees, as well as issues of affirmative defenses under § 547(c).

The debtor lost his interest in real estate as the result of a pre-petition judgment, execution, and confirmation of sale. Post-petition actions regarding a writ of assistance and the distribution of sale proceeds did not violate the automatic stay