The court denied the debtors' request to use cash collateral because the bank was not adequately protected. The projected receipts would barely cover expenses, and there was no additional collateral to protect the bank's interest against risk.

Court found that debtors did not intentionally present false financial information to plaintiff, or that plaintiff relied on it if they had. There also was no evidence that debtors willfully, intentionally or maliciously damaged plaintiff's collateral

Hearing on creditor's objection to claim; trustee had already objected to the claim in question and was overruled. The creditor may object to the claim, because the trustee did not present evidence at hearing. Motion to reconsider the claim granted

Reported at 63 B.R. 140. This decision rectified the inconsistent local practice at the time concerning claims allowance in Chapter 13 cases, and established the procedure whereby claims are allowed as filed unless objected to by the trustee or debtor

Trustee's objection to claim of exemptions is overruled. Nebraska exemption for workers' compensation benefits extends to the traceable use of such funds to an investment in a home for the workers' compensation recipient

The court ordered the debtor to amend his Chapter 11 disclosure statement with information to clarify the treatment of obligations owed to objecting creditors, to deal with the payment of income taxes, and to support his valuation of certain assets.

After a trial on interpretation of a reinsurance contract under Iowa law, the court held that debtor's subsidiaries were also parties to the contract; the contract did provide coverage; and premiums were due only for the years policies were issued.

The bank's contractual rights to the flow of payments received by the debtor under a purchase agreement may have priority over certain set-off rights claimed by the buyer. The court granted relief to the bank to obtain a determination of those rights.