Debtor developed & marketed bank cards. A customer attempted to terminate their agreement, so debtor moved to assume the contract. The court permitted assumption, as it was not a personal services contract & debtor adequately assured future performance

Debtors may amend exemptions until the case is closed, even after discharge. Nebraska statutes exempt "household furnishings," but if "necessary" is read into it, TVs and stereos aren't necessary. They may be exempted in lieu of homestead, however

The court reconsidered the amount of the allowed Chapter 11 administrative expense claim held by the debtor's employee benefit plans and increased the claim to include additional attorney fees and liquidated damages.

Proper adequate protection under § 363(e) for the use of collateral which is declining in value must be fully compensatory and must, as nearly as possible under the circumstances of the case, provide creditor with the value of his bargained-for rights

The court ruled that a proof of claim filed three days after the bar date was nevertheless timely filed because of the mailbox rule (Rule 9006(f)). The claimant's other arguments regarding excusable neglect and informal proofs of claim were overruled

Debtor's proposed compromise agreement to pay all creditors after dismissal of her case was in essence a private reorganization plan which could not be approved because it exceeded the scope of Rule 9019 and the court lacked jurisdiction to enforce it

Because the non-dischargeability complaint mainly involved state law causes of action, the court abstained to allow the parties to liquidate the claim in state court, and would determine dischargeability after the state court judgment was entered.

The parties had a bank card processing agreement, which in a previous order, was held to be assumable. The debtor sought to enforce payment terms under the contract, but it failed to show a threat of irreparable harm, so its motion for TRO was denied

Because § 1325(b)(1) refers to payments as of the plan's effective date, a debtor who has avoided a junior lien on his residence as wholly unsecured cannot deduct that mortgage payment as a secured debt when calculating projected disposable income.

The court denied a creditor's motion to sue another creditor in an effort to recover property for the estate. The court found that the creditor had no standing to act for the trustee and the proposed litigation would not benefit the bankruptcy estate.