The court has broad discretion in determining the proper remedy for a fraudulent conveyance. Here, where debtor received no benefit from the conveyance, the appropriate remedy was to annul the note & mortgage and return debtor to its previous position

Rooker-Feldman doctrine precludes federal court appellate review of state court decision

Judgment entered in favor of the debtor on section 727(a)(2) and 727(a)(4) claims. While debtor failed to schedule certain assets & debts, it didn't appear to be done with an intent to defraud

A state-court personal injury action against two debtors & a non-debtor party can go forward against the debtors because all parties are necessary for a determination of liability. A judgment would be uncollectible unless excepted from discharge.

Abstract: Under Brunner test, debtor failed to establish undue hardship for discharge of student loan debt under section 523(a)(8)(B)

Debtor filed adversary proceeding alleging that a California state court wrongfully directed the Office of Personnel Management to pay certain of his retirement funds to his ex-wife. Lack of subject-matter jurisdiction required dismissal of some counts

The court granted a motion for relief from stay because the value of debtor's offer of adequate protection in crops & waiver of state law rights was unclear, and the court must weigh the debtor's offer against the risk to the creditor's collateral value

Under Rule 9006, a complaint was filed out of time. A prior order said time would begin to run when requested discovery documents were received, so a letter notifying plaintiff that all such discovery had already been provided started the clock running