Landlord's objection to debtor's abandonment of underground gasoline storage tanks was overruled. Landlord retained same remedy (claim for damages) in bankruptcy as he would have had outside bankruptcy
You are here
Opinions
United States Courts Opinions (USCOURTS) collection is a collaborative effort between the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) to provide public access to opinions from selected United States appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts.
The District of Nebraska offers a database of opinions for the years 1997 to current, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.
Debtor's professional accounts receivable are not exempt under Neb. Rev. Stat. section 25-1558
Order approving stipulation is binding and cannot be altered by the parties after intervening rights have become vested in reliance on the order
The debtor's interest in her ex-husband's 401(k) plan is exempt personal property. Trustee cannot claim post-petition alimony payments because debtor's right to payment accrues each month
Court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment. Debtors were third-party beneficiaries of a condition precedent contained in the loan documents, and a fact question existed as to whether the condition precedent was satisfied and/or waived
Debtor held power to exercise dominion and control over trust corpus on petition date, so trust corpus was property of the bankruptcy estate
Under Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal court has no subject-matter jurisdiction to review state court decision
Intervenor argued that its interest was superior to that of the trustee because it owned the vehicles the debtor was purchasing from defendant. Court ruled in trustee's favor, as intervenor was unable to prove constructive trust or unjust enrichment.
Abstract: Under Brunner test, debtor failed to establish undue hardship for discharge of student loan debt under section 523(a)(8)(B)
Lender was not permitted to amend its non-dischargeability complaint to add a claim for relief under section 523(a)(2). The court ruled that the proposed amendment was untimely under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c) & did not relate back to original complaint