The debt at issue, based on a promissory note signed post-confirmation, was a post-petition obligation and was not subject to discharge. The automatic stay did not prohibit the plaintiff from attempting to collect the debt via a state court lawsuit.
You are here
Opinions
United States Courts Opinions (USCOURTS) collection is a collaborative effort between the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) to provide public access to opinions from selected United States appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts.
The District of Nebraska offers a database of opinions for the years 1997 to current, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.
A plethora of factual and legal issues precluded a decision on the debtors' motion for sanctions for violation of the automatic stay with regard to a post-petition state-court lawsuit and temporary injunction entered against the debtors.
Defendants who operated as debtors in possession improperly bid at foreclosure sale of estate property, which under the circumstances breached their fiduciary duty. No sanctions, beyond extreme disappointment, were imposed on debtors' counsel.
In order to accommodate settlement agreements made between the debtor and various liability insurers, the court deferred the creditors' committee's motion to dissolve an injunction prohibiting personal injury litigation against the debtor.
A factual issue existed as to whether Article 9 U.C.C. financing statements were "seriously misleading" when it was unclear whether a records search using debtor's legal name in the filing office's search logic would find the financing statement.
The court authorized the appointment of an attorney experienced in personal injury litigation as an expert to estimate the value of personal injury claims against the debtor and prepare a non-binding recommendation for bankruptcy purposes only.
The garnishment of debtor's pay couldn't be avoided as a preference because the amount didn't meet § 547(c)(8)'s monetary threshold regardless of whether the transfer occurred on the date wages were earned or the date they were paid to the creditor.
The debtors and two lenders disputed the amount owed on the lenders’ claims. The claims were ultimately determined, along with an amount for administrative expenses. The amounts were final, and debtors’ motion for new trial should have been denied.
The bank exercised its deed of trust powers and sold real property owned by the debtors after the bankruptcy case had been dismissed and before it was reinstated. There was no evidence of an improper sale, so the buyers were entitled to summary judgment.
Debtor may compromise claims with its insurance companies to use the insurance proceeds to fund a trust for tort claimants. It is in the estate's and claimants' interest to have a single fund available, rather than engaging in piecemeal litigation.