Costs incurred by the debtors' landlord in efforts at the appellate level to collect post-petition rent were not recoverable as administrative expenses under § 365(d)(3) because that section applies only until assumption or rejection of a lease.
You are here
Opinions
United States Courts Opinions (USCOURTS) collection is a collaborative effort between the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) to provide public access to opinions from selected United States appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts.
The District of Nebraska offers a database of opinions for the years 1997 to current, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.
Joint debtors who co-own a vehicle that they both use to commute to and from work may each claim a tool-of-the-trade exemption in the vehicle under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2556(4), just as they may each claim a wildcard exemption under § 25-1552.
The court imposed sanctions in the form of actual and punitive damages against a creditor and a collection agency that violated the automatic stay by endeavoring to collect a debt from the debtors, even after being advised of the bankruptcy case.
The owner of real property purchased at a county treasurer's tax sale is entitled to an administrative expense claim for post-petition taxes, and the plan should be amended to reflect the statutory interest rate on the tax claim as allowed by § 511(a).
An unsecured junior lien on debtor's residential real estate may be avoided after the debtor completes Chapter 13 plan payments. The bankruptcy court's Sanders decision, interpreting Nobelman, permits wholly unsecured liens to be stripped off.
A debtor could not avoid the interest of a purchaser of property at a trust deed sale simply because the trustee's deed had not been recorded as of the petition date. The trustee's acceptance of the buyer's bid terminated debtor's rights to the property.
The sellers of real property paid the property taxes after the debtors defaulted on the purchase. The sellers sought to except those payments from discharge, but § 523(a)(1)(A) was inapplicable because the claimants were not a "governmental unit."
Debtors' landlord did not have a perfected security interest in crops because his financing statement did not sufficiently describe the collateral. His amendment to the U.C.C. financing statement may be a preference if insolvency can be shown.
The $50 late charge for each day debtors' rent was past due should not have been cumulative; rather, it should have simply been charged per day for each day that any rent remained unpaid between the date of abandonment and the date of bankruptcy filing.
A vendor of the debtor's products violated an injunction against litigation by pursuing an action against the debtor's insurer in a personal injury case and was held in contempt, with appropriate sanctions to be imposed after an evidentiary hearing.