You are here

Opinions

United States Courts Opinions

United States Courts Opinions (USCOURTS) collection is a collaborative effort between the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) to provide public access to opinions from selected United States appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts.

The District of Nebraska offers a database of opinions for the years 1997 to current, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.

After a stipulation on a motion for stay relief was repudiated, a hearing was held to determine debtors' equity in the property, their need for the property in an effective reorganization, and their ability to adequately protect the lender's interest

The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's order granting relief from the stay, finding that the secured creditor was not adequately protected and the debtor had not been able to establish a realistic prospect of a successful reorganization

Court ordered trustee to abandon real estate to the contract seller. The amount owed exceeded the land value, and it was leased to a tenant. To assume the lease & rents, the trustee would have to cure the contract default, which wouldn't benefit the estat

The court granted stay relief to a lender with a security interest in the debtors' grain, livestock, equipment, and real estate. The debtors had no equity in the collateral and presented no evidence that it was necessary to an effective reorganization

The district court reversed the bankruptcy court's denial of a compromise in a preference action between the trustee and a secured lender. The bankruptcy court should have taken evidence on whether the compromise was in the best interest of the estate

Relief from the automatic stay was granted to a junior lienholder in real estate because the property was over-encumbered, interest was accruing, the lienholder's collateral position was deteriorating, and debtors offered no adequate protection

Reported at 51 B.R. 526. Creditor repossessed and sold part of its collateral without notice to the debtors. Because of the notice violation, it may not seek a deficiency judgment, but its allowed secured claim should be provided for in the Chap. 13 plan

Proper adequate protection under § 363(e) for the use of collateral which is declining in value must be fully compensatory and must, as nearly as possible under the circumstances of the case, provide creditor with the value of his bargained-for rights

District court reversed the bankruptcy court's order, ruling that counsel's representation of a creditor, alternating with his representation of the creditors' committee, created a potential conflict of interest which precluded compensation

The district court reversed the bankruptcy court's dismissal of the case pursuant to § 1112(b)(1), remanding the matter to permit the bankruptcy court to take evidence on the issues of asset valuation and the reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation

Pages